Pages

Monday, September 19, 2011

Sexual offenses and children

Why parents love their children? All of children have born as a result of natural sexuality. That is why parents really love their children. If all the children have born without a sexual intercourse between parents, there will not be a real love between parents and their children too. The sexual pleasure which is generating between two parents is strongly attached with the love which is generating between parents and their children.  
            If parents really love their children they must build up their children’s sexuality in a successful healthy way which is natural from the younger ages. Then they will be able to set up the society and also they will be able to create their next generation. Masculinity is a paternal inheritance and it determines the male sexuality as well. On the other hand femininity is a maternal inheritance and it determines the female sexuality as well. That is how parents of a person become the most responsible people for determining that particular person’s sex drive. Shaping the gender rolls of children with correct specifications is the main factor of this. Real fathers must rise up their sons in a masculine way and they must let mothers to rise up their daughters in a feminine way too. Keep in mind; children will become adults in future. Parents with social responsibilities must teach their children to accept the natural sexuality from the younger ages. They must teach their children what there must be an acceptable sexual life style which is natural in the society too. Then they will realize that they must spend their lives according to those particular conditions.
                        We must protect children from sexually abusing. That is for protecting their sexual life in future and that is not for joy of people who are trying to deform the natural sexuality. It is wrong if a grown man sexually abused an underage girl, when that particular girl is following a real feminine way of life according to the society and if she is accepting the natural sexual life style. But if children are being sexually abusing by homosexuals, that is too dangerous. If we considered an incident of a man sexually abusing an underage girl and, if we considered another incident of a gay man is sexually abusing an underage boy or a lesbian is abusing an underage girl, these incidents are not similar. First one is wrong just because of it is causing to collapse the acceptable sexual lifestyle of the society. But the second incident is wrong, not just because of causing to collapse the sexual lifestyle; it is not the natural way of sex and it is abnormal. So that is why it is too dangerous. We must protect the children from sexually abusing them by adults while we are protecting the natural sexuality and the acceptable sexual lifestyle.  

24 comments:

  1. ''It is wrong if a grown man sexually abused an underage girl, when that particular girl is following a real feminine way of life according to the society and if she is accepting the natural sexual life style.''

    If the girl is not following a real feminine way of life according to the society then abuse is ok?

    ReplyDelete
  2. @Vada
    " If the girl is not following a real feminine way of life according to the society then abuse is ok? "

    If the girl is not following a real feminine way of life according to the society, then the term of "sexual abuse" cannot be applied to that situation. We need to protect women and girls until they are being feminine and accepting the masculinity of men as well. Otherwise anyone doesn't want to protect them from abusers. Feminine women and girls are the valuable ones rather than non feminine feminists.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I can't follow you. Maybe its the language barrier as english is not your first language, but are you implying that abuse of children is ok if according to that child's particular "society" he or she is thought of by some members of that society as non-feminine or non-masculine. In my Amma's culture there is a custom of boys and young men dressing up like women to perform in dramas, instead of getting girls to play those same roles. To the wider society this is not masculine, so I guess by your estimation if any of these boys or teens were abusd then it doesn't count as abuse?

    Many people have reported to me that when they travel in countries like India and sri Lanka countries they are struck by how "feminine" the men are n their mannerisms as compared to the West.

    Therefore I guess there can be no human rights violations in Desh because men are found to be "feminine" according to the wider world and therefore their lives not of value?

    Your view of things would result in total lawlessness.

    ReplyDelete
  4. @Vada
    I am not asking you to follow me. However I am not implying that abusing of children is correct. But the fact what I want to point out is, sexually abusing of children is wrong within a special social situation. Masculine men and feminine women are the real contributors of creating the human society. The definitions of abusive sexuality and sexual offenses are heavily depending on the social background. Especially I am saying that we must protect the children from sexually abusing them by adults while we are protecting the natural sexuality and the acceptable sexual lifestyle as well. I am strongly saying that LGBT people are not the real contributors of creating any society, so we must not give any chance for this kind of people to misuse the words like "sexual abuse, Child abuse, Sexual offense, etc". Asian men are not feminine, but there is an amount of people who are following western post modernism. Some of men who are following western post modernism are trying to be feminine deliberately in any Asian country.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "But the fact what I want to point out is, sexually abusing of children is wrong within a special social situation."

    You have no idea what you're talking about.

    Child abuse is a CRIME. To say its only a crime if the child is behaving a certain way is evil.

    ReplyDelete
  6. @PRIYA

    Point must apply in the opposite way, that means I have a clear idea that how we can speak words with the definitions and how the words which we are speaking become active. You have no idea of such things and you are saying that child abusing is a crime just because of every one is telling like that. You are speaking the words of child abusing without a clear idea about how these words become active. I am strongly saying that we must protect children from sexually abusing them by adults while we are protecting their sexuality and their future sex life. We have a great responsibility to protect the real nature of sexuality as well as there is a responsibility to prevent child abusing. Sexually abusing an under age girl by an adult male is wrong because of it can cause various social problems. These definitions are not there for satisfying feminists and all the hypocrites who hate nature and natural male sexuality. Parents must protect children, and parents have a great responsibility to rise them up in a heterosexual way with correct gender specifications as well. Without a specific cultural background the words like sexual abuse cannot be active. There is an acceptable sexual lifestyle which is natural in any culture. Child abusing is wrong related to that life style. We don't want to satisfy people who have a hateful mindset about the real nature of sexuality. We know child abusing is wrong and we know that homosexual child abusing is the most dangerous thing rather than heterosexual child abusing. We know that hypocrites are OK with homosexual child abusing and they are bashing heterosexual acceptable lifestyle by focusing heterosexual child abusing. Once again I am telling that we must protect children with their sexuality and we must protect the heterosexual acceptable life style as well.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Maybe its the language barrier. You are not clear in your poor articulation of English. You are also speaking of things which you have no experience. You bring up LGBT, but children do not identify as LGBT until at least their adolecence, by which time they are no longer children. You at first said that child abuse is only wrong IF the child is acting in a manner deemed appropriate in his or her culture. That is clearly a criminal mindset. No matter what the child is "acting like" ABUSE IS WRONG AND A CRIME! Children do not identify has hetero, homo or trans because they are not yet sexually developed or matured enough to determine a sexual orientation for themselves.

    Children are a blank slate. And hence, no matter what the child acts like, whether it is a girl who is acting in what her culture thinks are boyish ways, or a boy who is acting in girlish ways, doesn't matter. Abuse is abuse and abuse is a crime.

    Why? Because it is highly damaging to the individual and to those around them.

    You obviously have no experience working with abused children or adults who have been abused in their youth. I do.

    The repercusions are deep and long lasting. Abused children often grow up to abuse their own children or others. And thus the cycle repeats itself generation after generation.

    Many Desi guys, with no real life experience, get on the internet and go to American or Western blogs and try to copy what Americans and Westerners are saying. This is what you are doing. Going from MRA blog to MRA blog, and trying to write about things which you have no direct experience of.

    There is absolutely NO NEED for Desi guys to jump on the MRA bandwagon. Desi guys are the most spoiled and pampered brats in the history of the world.

    My goodness - if a Desi bride suggests to her husband that they live separately from her in-laws, LIKE A NORMAL ADULT COUPLE, then you Desi guys accuse her of being a "radical feminist".

    You Desi guys wouldn't know REAL feminism if it bit you in the ass.

    Take my advice and go back to drinking your mother's milk and get off the internet. You do not have the experience or intelligence to tackle the subject matters you are trying to tackle.

    ReplyDelete
  8. English is not my first language, that is true. I am not saying that sexually abusing children is right. But I am saying that the definitions of sexual offenses are active only related to a specific social situation.
    You are telling that children's sexual orientation cannot be identified before their adolescence. That is wrong. Children have a basic idea about the opposite sex of them and from younger ages every one identifies gender specifications. Even they are children they like gender specifications. Until they reach their adolescence they may not have an urge to have sex, but they have feelings to identify their sexuality and their opposite sex.
    The second thing is that boys are following their fathers and girls are following their mothers naturally from younger ages. The sexual orientation of any one is heavily depending on that particular persons family, parents and the society which he or she is living in. All of responsible parents want their children to be heterosexuals, no doubt about that. Masculinity is a paternal inheritance while the femininity is a maternal inheritance. That is why all of fathers must rise their boys up in a masculine way like them and all of mothers must rise their girls up in a feminine way, this is a great responsibility of parents. That is the main reason to protect children from sexually abusing them.
    When the above facts are active we can talk about sexual offenses related to that particular situation. Because of we have basic concepts to compare sexual abuses. Without these basic factors no meaning of talking about sexual abuses. People like you do not know these things or people like you forget these things deliberately due to hypocrisy. This gender hypocrisy is a powerful threat to any society. Other thing is people like you are telling again and again that "Sexually abusing children is a crime" without comparing these crimes with the social situation and the acceptable sexual lifestyle. Law is not everything. There must be a society to active laws, rules and regulations. Natural way of sexuality is a powerful factor which is determining the way of establishing the society.
    I know people like you are yelling when an under age girl is abusing by an adult male. And I know that the same people are trying to omit homosexual child abusing when ever possible. When an adult male is sexually abusing a boy or an adult woman is sexually abusing an under age girl these hypocrites are not going to yell, even they are not going to speak any single word about that kind of a crime.
    I do not want to copy MRA blogs. I have a clear idea about sexuality and the society. I am strongly saying that homosexual offenses are the greater crimes. And I know very well that people like you are trying to cover and conceal them.
    So do not bother with my language skills. First you have to get rid of your hypocrisy.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "I do not want to copy MRA blogs. I have a clear idea about sexuality and the society. I am strongly saying that homosexual offenses are the greater crimes. And I know very well that people like you are trying to cover and conceal them"

    People like me? You mean people who are AGAINST ALL FORMS OF CHILD ABUSE, no matter what the sexual orientation of them?

    When I was living in Desh I came to know that there is ALOT of male on male sexual abuse going on there because of the gender segregation. Even some traditional Desi parents defended it, as long as it was not girl on guy. Their rationale was that sex between men and women BEFORE marriage is forbidden in their arranged marriage culture, but if their older sons were "diddling" with younger boys in the neighborhood that was OK. They would change once they got married to a female.

    DISGUSTING!

    And yet, if the very same sons were genuinely genetically disposed toward homosexuality and did not want to abuse younger boys before they married a woman, but rather be an open and honest adult about their sexual orientation and to engage in a mutual consenting relationship with another adult - those same parents would threaten to kill him or commit suicide out of "shame".



    Don't talk to me about hypocrisy, Desi dude. I know ALL ABOUT IT. I also lived in South Asia for the first half of my life.

    ReplyDelete
  10. @PRIYA
    If you are against all types of child abuses it is better. And I accept it too. But I want to tell something special. That is homosexual child abusing is the greater crime because of homosexuality is not the natural order of sexuality.

    "When I was living in Desh I came to know that there is ALOT of male on male sexual abuse going on there because of the gender segregation." Gender segregation is terrible; it is not an advanced human feature too. This is a weak point of their way of thinking.
    "Their rationale was that sex between men and women BEFORE marriage is forbidden in their arranged marriage culture, but if their older sons were "diddling" with younger boys in the neighborhood that was OK. They would change once they got married to a female." This rationale is not intelligent. They would not change once they got married to a female as they think. Most possible thing is that they would continue bisexual lifestyles due to sexual malpractices of their childhood. These kinds of stupid mindsets are not intelligent and virtuous.
    I will tell you another example. There is another stupid belief what homosexuality is ok for girls without any damage is done to their virginity among male population of some cultures.
    There are some reasons which are promoting these kinds of beliefs like sex between males and females before marriage is forbidden and girls getting pregnant before their marriage are forbidden. However these are not reasons for go against the real nature of sexuality. We must protect the natural sexuality and acceptable sexual life style which is natural. There must be successful ways of safe sex. It is possible to marry in very younger ages and spend successful lives too.

    ReplyDelete
  11. "If you are against all types of child abuses it is better. And I accept it too."

    Who ISN'T against ALL types of child abuse? Anyone who speaks out against or is an activisti against child abuse, does not say hetero child abuse is bad but homo child abuse is OK. Where did you get THAT idea from?

    It is a fact that there has always been a small minority of homosexual people in the human population. Peer reviewed scientific studies have linked that to genetics.

    As far as "bi-sexuals" - they are making a choice to swing both ways. That is more a matter of personal choice and social conditioning than "being wired that way".

    I don't know what the sexual climate is like in South Asia this year because the last time I was there was 2010, however I can speak for a trend that has been building in the US recently and that is heterosexual men who get turned on by seeing 2 or more women make love to each other. It is a genre in porn and you will sometimes even see it on regular non-porn TV as a means to entice male viewership.

    This is not actual homosexuality but simply a ploy to attract a male customer base. Such type of men also fantasize about "threesomes".

    In other words, it is male created and male dominated and it revolves around the desire of the male to "get off".

    I don't agree that this is a postive thing to be promoted in society, but many heterosexual males disagree with me. I do not want my daughters to be raised to think that their purpose in life is to sexually satisfy men by making love to other women for men's viewing pleasure or that having 3somes is something she should be expected to do to please a partner.

    NONETHELESS, all of the above, whether we are talking about hetero, homo, bi or 3somes, this is all ADULT activity and if an adult tries to involve an underaged minor in any of it - THAT IS WRONG AND IT IS A CRIME, whether that child is predisposed toward homo or heterosexuality is besides the point. The point here being that invovling a child in any type of adult sexuality is criminal and must be stopped.

    ReplyDelete
  12. "Who ISN'T against ALL types of child abuse? Anyone who speaks out against or is an activisti against child abuse, does not say hetero child abuse is bad but homo child abuse is OK. Where did you get THAT idea from? "

    Feminist are thinking in that way. I have many of experiences and I know well about their heterosexual poisoned mindset.
    "Peer reviewed scientific studies have linked that to genetics. "
    This is not true and the fact is according to the pseudo science which has formed by liberal false scientists who are supporting feminism and spreading out post
    modernism which is against the nature.
    "As far as "bi-sexuals" - they are making a choice to swing both ways. That is more a matter of personal choice and social conditioning than "being wired that way"."
    They are making a choice, so that is not a genetic inheritance. Question is how they are choosing this kind of a sexual behavior? The homosexual malpractices during their childhood are the facts behind that choice.
    "however I can speak for a trend that has been building in the US recently and that is heterosexual men who get turned on by seeing 2 or more women make love to each other. It is a genre in porn and you will sometimes even see it on regular non-porn TV as a means to entice male viewership. "
    Feminism and the post modernism created this trend. This is a part of feminists hidden agenda. Because of when males getting turned on by seeing lesbian sex that is helping them to justify homosexuality. Second thing is porn industry doesn't want to promote natural sexuality. I have seen that there are many of categories which are related to LGBT activities and all the kinds of sexual deformities in porn web sites. Actually the porn industry wants to complicate the natural sexuality and destroy the real nature of it.
    "This is not actual homosexuality but simply a ploy to attract a male customer base. Such type of men also fantasize about "threesomes". "
    But all of those activities are promoting homosexual behavior.
    "in other words, it is male created and male dominated and it revolves around the desire of the male to "get off"."
    This can be male created, but it is not intelligent and real male dominance. This is stupid and crazy. Real males cannot accept any kind of a homosexual behavior. Male hypocrites can do it.
    "I don't agree that this is a postive thing to be promoted in society, but many heterosexual males disagree with me. I do not want my daughters to be raised to think that their purpose in life is to sexually satisfy men by making love to other women for men's viewing pleasure or that having 3somes is something she should be expected to do to please a partner."
    That is correct. This is not a positive thing to promote. Every one must enjoy real sex.
    "NONETHELESS, all of the above, whether we are talking about hetero, homo, bi or 3somes, this is all ADULT activity and if an adult tries to involve an underaged minor in any of it - THAT IS WRONG AND IT IS A CRIME, whether that child is predisposed toward homo or heterosexuality is besides the point. The point here being that invovling a child in any type of adult sexuality is criminal and must be stopped. "
    We must protect children from sexually abusing them by adults while we are protecting the nature of sexuality and the acceptable heterosexual way of sex life. That is the real concept. Parents have a great responsibility to build up their children's sexuality in a heterosexual way from younger ages. Then only children become more valuable to the society.

    ReplyDelete
  13. PART 1


    Dulanth, may I ask which "Feminists" are saying that child abuse is ok as long as it is homosexual abuse? Did some famous Feminist write a book about it or something? Where did you get your information from?

    I've read a number of Feminist literatures and in not one of them have I ever read the promotion of homosexual child abuse. This is absurd and I think you are making it up.

    On the otherhand I know just recently in the United States a man who was the coach of a college male football team has recently been exposed as having brought little boys onto the college campus and molested them there! When the news about it spread to other faculty THOSE MEN DID NOT CALL THE POLICE! Rather they thought it was rumor and let this man go on coaching year after year at the college!

    Homosexual child abuse was covered up by MEN. Just look at what happened in the Catholic Church!

    Covered by men! Priests of all people!

    NAMBLA is, afterall, a MALE organziation. Never heard of it? I suggest you look it up and see what they are trying to promote in society.

    NAMBLA.

    But Feminists? Nope. Feminists are DEAD SET AGAINST ANY FORM OF CHILD ABUSE!!!

    Plus you must remember, there is no monolithic "feminism". Feminism is comprised of INDIVIDUALS with vastly differing opinions on a wide number of subject matter.

    Feminism is HUMANISTIC in ideals, and is against abuse and oppression, especially of children.

    But you can research NAMBLA to find out what some men are up to.

    ReplyDelete
  14. PART 2

    You also write:

    "Peer reviewed scientific studies have linked that to genetics. "
    This is not true and the fact is according to the pseudo science which has formed by liberal false scientists who are supporting feminism and spreading out post
    modernism which is against the nature."

    You throw out terms like "pseudo science" "liberal false scientists" "feminism" and "post modernism".

    It sounds like you read alot of Western websites, copy their terminology without knowing the history behind any of the terms, toss it all up into a salad and give your own spin on it.

    Homosexuality IS found in nature. It is found in both animals and humans, but it is a slim minority of both animals and humans who engage in that behaviour. This has NOTHING to do with Feminism, liberalism, post-modernism or anything of the sort.

    You simply do not know what you are talking about and you have neither the academic background NOR the life experience to talk about these things.

    If you look through history you will find that male on male sexual activity has been common. Greek culture, yes all those "great philosophers" who "built the foundations of Western Civilization" with their ideas, came from a culture in which women were kept in the domestic sphere and men and boys were in the public sphere, and they engaged in both homo-social and homo-sexual activities with one another.

    Another example is South Asia. The culture there is largely homo-social. Marriages are arranged and romance between boys and girls, even simple friendships between boys and girls, are discouraged and boys and girls socialize with other boys and girls. Along with this homosocial environment sexual experimentation with the same sex, because afterall, there is "dating culture" per se in South Asia for the most part.

    Middle East is the same.

    Look at same sex boarding schools. Whereever you boys going to school and living together without females - you get homosexual behaviour.

    Look at the sailing industry. Back in the day when sailing was a major all-male industry and men were at sea for months on end - you get homosexual behaviour.

    All of this is largely seen as temporary because for MOST of these men and boys, they only turned to each other for sex because females were not available to them. Once females become available to them - they have sex with females.

    Look at the scandals of the "celibate" priests in the Catholic Church.

    Whereever you have an all male environment, then consensual sexual activity between adults males, or experimentation between boys and youths OR the very worst - exploitation and abuse of boys by grown men, becomes, if not common, at least not uncommon.

    ReplyDelete
  15. PART 3

    Human sexuality is flexible in that it can go either way and it will go the way in which there is availability, genetic setting being either hetero (majority) or homo (minority), but depending on the situation the person may not have access to the gender he wants to have sex with.

    This is why you also find that men who never before in their lives imagined sex with other men - engage in sex with other men when they are locked up in prison together for a long time.

    Same with women who are incarcerated for a long time.

    Now, as far as people who from their very early childhood feel attracted to the same sex - they are GENETICALLY predisposed toward homosexuality. This is rare. But it is found in nature.

    There are also babies born without male or female genitals but a combo of both. At that time the parents have to make decision on whether they want the baby to grow into a male or female, and then the doctor will perform a surgery.

    There are also children who, while being male, feel inside like they are female and vice versa.

    Again, all of these conditions are rare in nature BUT THEY DO HAPPEN to a small % of the population.

    I think you are mixing all the above scenarious up into a soup. They are not the same things. They are each different and unique and happen for different reasons.

    You seem to be responding to a media push to get society to open up to bisexuality. I also think such a push is wrong, even though I understand that human sexuality is flexible.

    Most people are heterosexuals. If we are not raised in a homo-social culture and have access to members of the opposite sex, then naturally when we become sexually curious, we will experiment with the opposite sex, not the same.

    But in places like India, Pakistan, the rest of South Asia and Middle East where dating is rare and where boys and girls and unmarried men and women are segregated, well, you get alot of same-sex experimentation UNTIL they get married.

    It might be wiser for those people to marry younger - perhaps at the age of 18 or so. That would depend of course upon other factors like their economic and social position.

    ReplyDelete
  16. PART 4

    I think you mean well and I think your heart is in the right place, however you do need to become more informed scientifically and socially as to what the factors are behind;

    homo-social cultures and their affect on young boys and girls

    homosexuality

    bisexuality

    babies born neither or both genders

    people who are born one gender but feel and identify as another gender

    These are all separate issues, with some overlapping.

    If you believe that the media is promoting sex too much and trying to get people to live their lives only for sex as if it were a god, then I'll agree with you.

    I also don't appreciate how sexually obsessed the media has become and I also think its a bad influence on kids.

    The solution is to THROW THE TV IN THE TRASH and keep your children away from internet porn, which is the main corrupter of innocence.

    This is all I will say on the matter.

    My family is from Nepal and India. Have you been to either place? Do you find either similar to Sri Lanka. I enjoyed Sri Lank very much.

    ReplyDelete
  17. @Priya - Part 1

    "I've read a number of Feminist literature s and in not one of them have I ever read the promotion of homosexual child abuse. This is absurd and I think you are making it up."

    Feminism is full of double standards and lies. Feminists never talking about their actual plans and hidden targets. No matter whether can believe this or you cannot, but the truth is they do not like to accept the rial nature of sexuality. They are not telling that openly. We can easily understand their hidden plans by focusing their behavior and studying about their attitudes and ideologies about sexuality. For example: they do not like gender specifications and gender base categorizing of human activities. Why....? Because of they know well that the feminine gender specifications are exactly corresponding to masculine gender specifications, they know that gender specifications are generating an attraction between men and women (Between boys and girls as well). A well known argument of feminists is that gender based categorizing of activities is an injustice for women and women must do everything that men are doing in spite of male sexual preferences and attraction between two sexes. Feminists are suggesting that gender specifications, are great obstacles for the progress of women. That is why they are opposing gender specifications and heterosexual orientation. According to this kind of attitudes and a behavior, they are taking the advantages of all the kinds of sexual deformities. They know that the main obstruction for feminists to behave like men in spite of gender specifications is the heterosexuality. That is how they expects to promote homosexuality. They know that when adult gays are abusing little boys from younger ages this will emasculate that boys and there is a great probability to that boys to follow homosexual lifestyle. Feminists know that homosexuals are not bothering with feminism and they know that they are supporting feminism as well. Remember that there are lots of lesbian feminists too. Their target is also taking the full advantage of complicated sexuality in the society and promote lesbianism as well. So these things are enough to proof that feminism and feminists are secretly supporting homosexual child abusing.

    "On the other hand I know just recently in the United States a man who was the coach of a college male football team has recently been exposed as having brought little boys onto the college campus and molested them there! When the news about it spread to other faculty THOSE MEN DID NOT CALL THE POLICE! Rather they thought it was rumor and let this man go on coaching year after year at the college!"

    These men are irresponsible. And if feminists are working against homosexuality and homosexual child abusing, they are not actual feminists. Some times they may partly following feminism. A primary concept of feminism is that the society must accept homosexuality. Do you know that...?

    ReplyDelete
  18. @Priya - Part 2

    "Homosexuality IS found in nature. It is found in both animals and humans, but it is a slim minority of both animals and humans who engage in that behaviour. This has NOTHING to do with Feminism, liberalism, post-modernism or anything of the sort."

    This is not natural, and if it is found in animals that is an artificially formed feature by the people who are using biology as a weapon to justify homosexuality. There are no homosexual behaviors among animals which are generating pleasure.

    " If you look through history you will find that male on male sexual activity has been common. Greek culture, yes all those "great philosophers" who "built the foundations of Western Civilization" with their ideas, came from a culture in which women were kept in the domestic sphere and men and boys were in the public sphere, and they engaged in both homo-social and homo-sexual activities with one another.

    Another example is South Asia. The culture there is largely homo-social. Marriages are arranged and romance between boys and girls, even simple friendships between boys and girls, are discouraged and boys and girls socialize with other boys and girls. Along with this homosocial environment sexual experimentation with the same sex, because afterall, there is "dating culture" per se in South Asia for the most part.

    Middle East is the same.

    Look at same sex boarding schools. Whereever you boys going to school and living together without females - you get homosexual behaviour.

    Look at the sailing industry. Back in the day when sailing was a major all-male industry and men were at sea for months on end - you get homosexual behaviour.

    All of this is largely seen as temporary because for MOST of these men and boys, they only turned to each other for sex because females were not available to them. Once females become available to them - they have sex with females.

    Look at the scandals of the "celibate" priests in the Catholic Church.

    Whereever you have an all male environment, then consensual sexual activity between adults males, or experimentation between boys and youths OR the very worst - exploitation and abuse of boys by grown men, becomes, if not common, at least not uncommon. "

    All of the above mentioned things by you are great social weak points. For example when all of men are equally masculine and the all of women are equally feminine there is no room for homosexuality. No matter men are working together in any field and how long they are working together. This thing is same for female community as well.

    ReplyDelete
  19. @ PART 3

    " Human sexuality is flexible in that it can go either way and it will go the way in which there is availability, genetic setting being either hetero (majority) or homo (minority), but depending on the situation the person may not have access to the gender he wants to have sex with. "

    There is a special period of breeding can be found in most of animals. Both male and female creatures are sexually become active in that period. Most of female creatures can sexually engage with their male creatures during the ovulation period. On the other hand most of male creatures sexually become active when the female creatures are indicating that their ovulating is beginning by the hormone levels of their urine.
    But in human beings psychological factor of the sex is controlling the sexual attraction between males and females in addition to hormonal actions. Hormones are mainly functioning as the factors of puberty and as the factors of activating sex drives as well.
    Human sexuality is flexible towards heterosexual way it not flexible towards homosexuality. Gender specifications are always going on because of this flexibility. When males form a set of activities based on masculinity which is determining by the natural male sexuality, females are responding to that based on their natural sexuality and forming their femininity by creating a set of feminine gender specifications. Finally all of these things are promoting the heterosexual orientation. This is the real nature of flexibility. Boys are following their fathers and developing their masculinity while girls are following their mothers and developing their own femininity. These facts are actually providing a flexibility towards heterosexual way.

    "There are also babies born without male or female genitals but a combo of both. At that time the parents have to make decision on whether they want the baby to grow into a male or female, and then the doctor will perform a surgery."

    That is not wrong wrong at all. And it must happen in that way. Parents and the doctors must decide the sexuality when a genital abnormality comes out like that. There are some genetic and physical factors which are causing this kind of genital abnormalities at birth.

    " But in places like India, Pakistan, the rest of South Asia and Middle East where dating is rare and where boys and girls and unmarried men and women are segregated, well, you get a lot of same-sex experimentation UNTIL they get married."

    This is not an advanced feature of human beings, this is a great weakness of the way of thinking about the sexuality.

    ReplyDelete
  20. @ PRIYA 4

    "I think you mean well and I think your heart is in the right place, however you do need to become more informed scientifically and socially as to what the factors are behind;"

    I also think that your understanding is good as well. But my view is the science is not perfect.

    "homo-social cultures and their affect on young boys and girls

    homosexuality

    bisexuality

    babies born neither or both genders

    people who are born one gender but feel and identify as another gender

    These are all separate issues, with some overlapping."

    I can understand what these are separate from each other. But all of these things are abnormalities of sexuality.
    I can tell another thing which you may not believe. That is our souls are continuing after death.I mean the action of reborn. (I cannot explain deeply about this in English). However the thing what I want to tell is that gender abnormalities are closely related with the previous souls of the people who have that kind of abnormalities at present. I think you will not believe this.

    "I also don't appreciate how sexually obsessed the media has become and I also think its a bad influence on kids.

    The solution is to THROW THE TV IN THE TRASH and keep your children away from internet porn, which is the main corrupter of innocence."

    I totally agree with you. The media is totally corrupted. Internet porn and other porn media are big germs. Because of internet porn and other porn media are actually trying to complicate the natural sexuality and destroy the acceptable sexual lifestyle. Especially they are promoting LGBT activities rather than straight sexual activities. After all we do not need this stupid porn industry to teach about the sexuality to children.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Hi Dulanth,

    You are 100% wrong that Feminists will not act against child abuse. You obviously have not read any Feminist literature of repute and do not know the history of Feminism. As a Desi the idea of "consensual sexual activity" outside marriage is foreign to you and thus you think that Feminists would be for same-sex adults having non-consensual sex with same-sex minors just because of the same-sex part.

    You could not be more mistaken.

    Feminists are for consensual sex. Full stop. It doesn't matter whether its homo or hetero, what matters is that it is between 2 consensenting adults. Where there is no consent, that is rape. Full stop.

    Here's a good read on the topic of the history of male-on-male sexuality and how, from a social perspective it developed because of social factors that very closely resemble South Asian culture today.

    I am not a Christian so I don't agree with the Christian propaganda on that site, nor do I care what 2 grown adults do with each other consensually in the privacy of their own homes, so I do not agree with that aspect of the site either.

    However, as a general overview its a good read and reflects the Desi situation, even today.


    http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Sodomy/greek_homos.htm4

    ReplyDelete
  22. @ Priya

    "You are 100% wrong that Feminists will not act against child abuse. You obviously have not read any Feminist literature of repute and do not know the history of Feminism. As a Desi the idea of "consensual sexual activity" outside marriage is foreign to you and thus you think that Feminists would be for same-sex adults having non-consensual sex with same-sex minors just because of the same-sex part."

    I know these things what you have mentioned and I know what is the basis of feminism. I am not telling that feminists are not acting against child abuse. My point is that feminists are acting against child abuse, not because of child abusing is harmful for the children's future sex life. Feminists are doing so because of their male hatred mindset. Their primary object is punishing a male when ever possible rather than protecting children's sexuality and future sex life. They are especially focusing heterosexual men rather than homosexuals and they are not focusing lesbian child abusers at all.
    I know what is consensual sex between two adults. You are telling that "Feminists are for consensual sex". That is because of they do not like to take family responsibilities. And they prefer to support consensual sex between two homosexuals either gays or lesbians rather than supporting heterosexuals to do so.
    You are telling that "It doesn't matter whether its homo or hetero", consensual sex between a man and a woman can accept even it is outside marriage, because of it is natural. But homosexuality cannot be accepted if the relationship occurred between two adults and even it is consensual, because of it is not natural.

    ReplyDelete
  23. "You obviously have not read any Feminist literature of repute and do not know the history of Feminism."

    Everyone is very aware what a hate movement Feminism is and also where feminists want to remove the male population, turn boys into girls and any rights any man has..

    What books of repute are you talking about by the way. They are theories and are catagorised as fiction not fact. Maybe you should take off the rose coloured glasses as see excatly what feminists are all about..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Feminists have no literature, feminism is full of sexual lies and hypocrisy.

      Feminism is not based on the femininity, male hypocrites are the actual creators of feminism. Any one can understand that how male hypocrites are promoting and protecting feminism.

      Delete